From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 18777
Date: 2003-02-13
>Sure is mine. There is no reason to do not see the words vita, vitel,No. It's vi:ta > vita
>vitsea as not related to each other. But romanian "vita" has no cognate
>in latin.(still,but I guess there is one)
>Latin "vita" should have given in PRB vEta