From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 18171
Date: 2003-01-27
>---------------Especially since the /i/ was unstressed and the example was about the
>> 5) 6) 7) /é/, /ié/ and /o/ > /eá/, /ieá/, /oá/ before final -e and -a
>> (but not -u); d(i)récta > dreaptã but d(i)réctu > drept
>---------------
>
>here is nothing for our example since if "drept" is from Latin
>"directus", then "i" was elided and doesn't play a role here.
>---------------It doesn't matter, /e:/ follows the same path as /i/, and /i/ the same
>> 8) In Northern Romanian, before -e (not -a), /ea/ and /iea/ > /e/,
>> /ie/: lege > leadZe (= MRom. leadze) > ledZe; *measã pl. mese; *featã
>> pl. fete; *pieatrã, pl. pietre, *piearde > pierde)
>--------------
>
>for all these examples here we have the Latin words fetum, petra, perdo,
>everywhere an /e/ but no /i/
>--------------Sure: Latin /i/ cannot give /iea/.
>> 9) /iea/ > /ia/ (Erba > ierba > iearba > iarbã, pEtra > pietra >
>> pieatra > piatrã). Likewise tErra > tiera > tieara > t,arã; sEpte >
>> siepte > sieapte > s,apte)
>--------------
>
>here the same: herba, petra, septem, terra. No /i/ at all.
>-------------vir(i)dia > varzã, virga > vargã "rod", etc.
>> 10) In Northern Romanian, /ea/ > /a/ after a labial: MRom. measã,
>> featã > Rom. masã, fatã
>------------
>
>here the same: mensa, fetum , no /i/ at all.
>Now we come to your derivation:Nope.
>
>Latin viridia -> PBR vérdia > [5] veárdia > veárzã > [10] várzã
>
>From your /ie/ which comes from an /e/ or /ea/ but not from an /i/ you
>want to get an /ea/ before /r/.
>I agree , it can be I misunderstood something.Yep. You should distinguish between Romance /e/ (in the handbooks