Re: [tied] Vocative [Re: yellow]

Miguel Carrasquer wrote:

> On Sat, 25 Jan 2003 14:31:03 -0000, "tolgs001 <gs001ns@...>"
> <gs001ns@...> wrote:
>
>> Miguel Carrasquer wrote:
>>
>>> Of the cases, the vocative was lost
>>
>> but the vocative is still extant in Romanian,
>> isn't it?
>
> In view of the feminine vocative -o, I think it more likely that the
> vocative was lost as everywhere else in Romance, and was reintroduced
> from Slavic
>
> =======================
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> mcv@...
>

It can be a possiblity. And the rest of vocatives in "a", "lor", "i",
"e" was rediscovered, or how?