Re: [tied] das Wort

On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 14:35:24 -0000, "tgpedersen"
<tgpedersen@...> wrote:

>--- In cybalist@..., Piotr Gasiorowski <piotr.gasiorowski@...>
>wrote:
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Miguel Carrasquer
>> To: cybalist@...
>> Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 12:55 AM
>> Subject: Re: [tied] das Wort
>>
>>
>> > Perhaps then Germanic (ga-)warr- "confusion" (> Pol.
>gwar "turmoil, fuss")? Not sure if it's in Gothic, but since it also
>gives Romance *gwerra "war", it was apparently available.
>>
>> But isn't the Gmc. root *wers-/*werz-? If so, EGmc. *ga-werzan-
>doesn't fit.
>>
>> Piotr
>
>Odd. Y'all have just discussed, by some coincidence, two words
>containing an unwanted dental suffix, <salt> and <word>.

The *-d in salt may be odd, but what's unwanted about *dh in
word/verbum?

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...