[tied] Re: celtic-getae cognates

From: ravichaudhary2000
Message: 16796
Date: 2002-11-18

--- In cybalist@..., alexmoeller@... wrote:
> > What is your source.
> >
> > and what do these words mean in todays English
> >
> > Ravi
>
> [Moeller]
> my sources are the getic and celtic glosses.they are published
> in several books. for the getic there are 3 big names who
> searcehd for them: Thomashek, Decev and Mateescu and some by
> Poghirc.
>
> they do not means too much in toda englsih. they are just
> toponimes and hidronimes with an amasing similarity.and they
> dont match some linguistic ideea. Normally the getae should be
> so like the celts even if the celts and the getae lived
> together many hounderds of years . Or maybe some linguistics
> ideas are not right.
********
Alex

Words always mean something.

The words you use, must have meant something then and would mean
something now.

If the Celts and Getae lived together, they must have communicated
with each other


What do

Thomashek, Decev and Mateescu and/or Poghirc.
say ?

Who are these authorities ?

Ravi