| Number | Author | Date | Title |
|---|
| 16623 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2002-11-08 | Re: [tied] To be or not to be a linguist |
| 16626 | gevans613@... | 2002-11-08 | Re: [tied] To be or not to be a linguist |
| 16627 | S.Kalyanaraman | 2002-11-08 | Re: [tied] To be or not to be a linguist |
| 16628 | S.Kalyanaraman | 2002-11-08 | Re: [tied] To be or not to be a linguist |
| 16630 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2002-11-08 | Re: [tied] To be or not to be a linguist |
| 16634 | gevans613@... | 2002-11-08 | Re: [tied] To be or not to be a linguist |
| 16638 | CeiSerith@... | 2002-11-09 | Re: [tied] To be or not to be a linguist |
| 16640 | juhavs | 2002-11-09 | Re: [tied] To be or not to be a linguist |
| 16654 | S.Kalyanaraman | 2002-11-10 | Gulf of Khambat Cultural Complex |
| 16657 | juhavs | 2002-11-10 | Re: Gulf of Khambat Cultural Complex |
| 16660 | S.Kalyanaraman | 2002-11-10 | Re: Gulf of Khambat Cultural Complex |
| 16674 | juhavs | 2002-11-10 | Re: Gulf of Khambat Cultural Complex |
| 16680 | S. Kalyanaraman | 2002-11-11 | Gulf of Khambat Cultural Complex |
| 16681 | S.Kalyanaraman | 2002-11-11 | Gulf of Khambat Cultural Complex |
| 16682 | S.Kalyanaraman | 2002-11-11 | Re: Gulf of Khambat Cultural Complex |
| 16686 | juhavs | 2002-11-11 | Re: Gulf of Khambat Cultural Complex |
| 16687 | Juha Savolainen | 2002-11-11 | Permission to cite extensively? |
| 16689 | S.Kalyanaraman | 2002-11-11 | Re: Permission to cite extensively? |
| 16690 | S.Kalyanaraman | 2002-11-11 | Re: Gulf of Khambat Cultural Complex |
| 16694 | juhavs | 2002-11-11 | Re: Permission to cite extensively? |
| 16708 | Richard Wordingham | 2002-11-12 | Re: [tied] To be or not to be a linguist |
| 16709 | guto rhys | 2002-11-12 | Re: [tied] To be or not to be a linguist |
| 16712 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2002-11-12 | Re: [tied] To be or not to be a linguist |
| 16714 | guto rhys | 2002-11-12 | Re: [tied] To be or not to be a linguist |
| 16716 | Richard Wordingham | 2002-11-12 | Re: [tied] To be or not to be a linguist |
| 16720 | tgpedersen | 2002-11-13 | Re: [tied] To be or not to be a linguist |