Re: [tied] Re: slavic methathesis

From: Sergejus Tarasovas
Message: 15511
Date: 2002-09-16

A self-correction:
*or > *orU > *or/*oro, then *oro > *ro
-----Original Message-----
From: Sergejus Tarasovas [mailto:S.Tarasovas@...]
Sent: 2002 m. rugsėjo 16 d. 11:17
Subject: RE: [tied] Re: slavic methathesis

Some scholars think so (or postulate slightly different scenario: *or > *orU > *or/*oro).
>> Wouldn't it be possible to argue for (without loss of generality):
*or > *oro > *ro etc, so that pleophony becomes an intermediate
stage? If so, it would be one, not separate developments.

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.