From: Richard Wordingham
Message: 15390
Date: 2002-09-11
>Alex, could you please let non-Romanians in on the conversation. I
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "George" <gs001ns@...>
> To: <cybalist@...>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 12:01 PM
> Subject: [tied] Rum. sce/sci > $te/$ti [Re: -ishte, -eshte]
> >[Moeller]hmmmm "s" becam "sh" before "t" just when "t"
> >fallowed by e and i.
>
> No! Only when s + ce & s + ci, *and* ce/ci already =
> [t$e/t$i],
> only then you can get > $t.
>
> [Moeller] wie bitte? What about sceptru, sceptic, discerne,
> disciplina, scindare,?Common George, please.