From: george knysh
Message: 15284
Date: 2002-09-08
>****%%%%%: Are you saying that there are no Old
> >--- Piotr Gasiorowski <piotr.gasiorowski@...>
> >wrote:
> >
> > ><kupfern> or <silbern> are of
> > >course based on <Kupfer> and <Silber> and should
> be
> > >cut into <kupfer-n> and <silber-n> accordingly.
> >
> >*****GK: Would this mean that, other problems
> aside,
> >"Blacher-n" would be morphologically correct?****
>
> Piotr's explanation makes sense. I didn't know how
> old this
> German -ern might be. That's why I put my question.