From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 15152
Date: 2002-09-06
>For me personaly the diminutives of romanian is too a veryBourciez (#469) [translated from the French]:
>interesting aspect because there are really a l o t , but
>indeed a l o t of modalities to construct them.
>From the several lanaguages I speak, I dont know one to be so
>rich in the way to make such dimntives. About german at least,
>I should say is a very poor one with "chen" and "lei" as only
>forms for making diminutives.
>Person name masculine= Ion
>Cases of diminutives: Ionel, Ionitzã, Ionicã
>Person name feminine: Maria
>Diminutives: Marioara, Mariuca,Mãriutza
>For things in feminineFurca= furculitza , lingura=linguritza,
>gradina=gradinitza,
> "el" or "ior"ciorap=ciorapel= ciorapior, pantof=pantofior
>( here pantofel sounds strange, unnaturaly), cojoc=cojocel (
>here cojacior sounds unnaturaly)
>miel=lamb= mielutz, mielushel
>copil=copilash , copilandru( utz doesnt sound naturaly here
>for copilutz) but for feminine copila=copilitza=copilandra
>
>Grrrr, there are indedd too much, I could give just a part of
>them.
>Maybe it is worth that a romanian linguist will make a study
>about it..