[tied] Re: for Alvin
Von: "Miguel Carrasquer" <mcv@...
Gesendet: Samstag, 17. August 2002 13:51
Betreff: Re: [tied] Re: for Alvin
> Assuming the objection is meant to be "later than the loss of Dacia": > s=
o what? Romanian does not continue the Latin of Roman Dacia.
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
And your meaning about? Romanian should be the latin of Balcan peninsula ?=
That would fit with well the assumption the roumanins have hade migrate in =
sec IX-XIII north of Danube