Miguel:
>We were talking about Ablaut in general. What you said was that "the
>root CANNOT lose its syllabicity within a paradigm".
As usual, you wish to derail the topic with irrelevancies. Since
we're talking about nominal ablaut (or at least _were_), this is what
I was refering to.
Now you've suddenly changed the topic from under me and of
course my words no longer apply. This habit of yours is irritating
to say the least and not conducive to good debate.
- gLeN
_________________________________________________________________
Join the world�s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com