Re: [tied] Re: the true nature of

>The important point is that *none* of these authorities has ever even
>considered the suggestion I am making now.

How does your suggestion differ from the versions of Sommer, and of Leumann,
who also propose a reversion in Pre-Italic from *aktos to *agtos?

>scholars apparently want things to be either totally regular or
>totally analogical. That is nothing short of idiotic.

I thoroughly agree with you.

Peter