From: wtsdv
Message: 13961
Date: 2002-07-02
>Thank you, and how disturbing! Nowhere on the site can I find
> The dictionary you cite is a piece of science fiction. As is
> commonly known, _no_ Yatvingian (aka Sudovian aka Dainavian)
> texts have been discovered yet, and even the status of the
> "Yatvingian language" is still discussed (an Old Prussian
> dialect? a separate West (aka periferal) Baltic language?
> some special language, "transitional" between Baltic and
> Slavic languages?).
> Some _very_ tentative and rather unreliable guesses on theSo then I guess that this "dictionary" is someone's attempted
> (mostly morphophonological) structure of the language which
> have been made by now are based mostly on the material provided
> by some southern Lithunian dialects, presumably influenced by
> Yatvingian, and on the toponymy ...