Re: Nostratic's New Guinea Home

--- In cybalist@..., x99lynx@... wrote:

> This means that the first time we meet a significant modern per

capita

> concentration in the Underhill data on grandpa m168, pa m98 or

daughter m09

> is -- believe it or not -- New Guinea. You can explain the

concentrations of

> later 09 mutations as you wish, but if you are going to use them to

prove

> origins, then New Guinea sure gives exactly the same evidence of

being m09's

> original origin place. Or at least being near it.
>
> Finally, it seems a little inconsistent to find all these origin

points in

> other per capita concentrations and then balk when New Guinea shows

up.

>
> Steve

Aha! Oho! Sundaland! Floods! Disasters! I told you so! (and annoying
etc etc)

Torsten