From: george knysh
Message: 13471
Date: 2002-04-24
> the last case [Germanic GK] the languages inquestion are still
> mutually intelligible and form dialectal continua is*****GK: I don't believe anyone could have better
> irrelevant; what counts is that they are [all] the
> offspring of a common ancestor.
>exciting
> >>(Piotr:) Germanic as we know it (with Grimm,
> Verner and the stress shift) is also a recent
> product -- not even 2500 years old.
>
> *****GK: About as "recent" as Baltic and Slavic*****
>
>(Piotr) Hey, it was you who claimed that nothing
> has happened for the last 2500 years. Have you*****GK (new) While I find the emergence of Ukrainian
> changed your mind? :))
> of someone who knows Portuguese but no Romanian and*****GK: You're right. But hey! I have a solution! How
> is trying to figure out the meaning of a sentence in
> the latter: "p&m�ntul era pustiu Si gol; peste faTa
> adincului de ape era �ntunerec". ("S, T" = "s, t"
> with underhooks, "&" = "a" breve). Even with your
> Latin you might be at a loss.
>__________________________________________________
> Piotr
>