Re: [tied] Satem

From: David Sánchez
Message: 13426
Date: 2002-04-23

What about Albanian, Piotr? that presents Satemised form together with non-satemised forms:
 
(1) Albanian <zjarm> 'fire' < IE <*gWhermos> [*gWh > zj, satemisation???]
 
(2) Albanian <pjek> 'I roast' < IE <*pekWo:> [regular *kW > k]
     Albanina <djeg> 'I burn' < IE <*dhegWo:> [regular *gWh > g]
     Albanian <pesë> 'five' < IE <*penkWe> [*kW > s ?????]
 
(3) Albaninan <thome, thotë> 'I say, he says' < IE <*k^emi, *k^eti> [regular *k^ > th]
     Albanian <dhëndër> 'son-in-law' < IE <*g^em@...> [regular *g^ > dh]
 
(4) Albanian <kam> 'i have' < IE <*kap.mi>
 
Another question, Piotr, we must conclude from these data that reconstructions with two "gutural" series must be abandoned?
 
David Sánchez