From: george knysh
Message: 13399
Date: 2002-04-21
> George wrote:*****GK: Yes he does point out that the Yamna(ya) c.
> <<And there is an interesting paper by Michail
> Turetskyi of Samara which
> tells us that the latest calibrated radiocarbon
> dates for the "developed"
> Yamna culture on the Middle Volga point to the
> period 3250-2750 BC. Thus
> "Early Yamna"
> would begin ca. 3500 BC.>>
>
> But I think Turetskyi is saying something else in
> the abstract about "early
> Yamna" that is more significant. One thing he does
> is identify the earliest
> Yamna ("Kurgan") materials with Repinskaya materials
> found in the "North
> Sub-Caspian".
> "The earliest graves of ancient-Yamnaya culture in__________________________________________________
> the Middle-Volga region
> can be dated by the first half of the III mill. B.C.
> ��� middle part of the III
> mill. B.C. At this time separated sites or elements
> of traditions of
> Repinskaya culture appears on the broad territory
> from the Dnieper to the
> Volga including the steppe Trans-Volga region as a
> result of migrations and
> diffusions. Material of Repinskaya culture from
> sites of North Sub-Caspian
> and funeral complexes of Yamnaya culture of
> north-steppe Samara Trans-Volga
> can be with great degree of confidence interpreted
> AS OF THE SAME CULTURE.
> (my caps)
>
> "This resemblance is revealed by typological
> proximity of ceramics,
> settlement and funeral sites. It is the clearest
> indicator of belonging to
> the early stage of Yamnaya culture.
>
> "There are no metal tools in numerous interments of
> this period. Scanty
> number of early Yamnaya burials means that Yamnaya
> tribes in the Middle-Volga
> region are not native. ... Predominant part of
> Yamnaya funerals of Samara
> Trans-Volga belongs to the late stage."
>
> Steve
>