From: tgpedersen
Message: 13346
Date: 2002-04-18
>languages consistently /æ/: <ælan>, (æ)liman, in Alanian /a/: *<alan-
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: tgpedersen
> To: cybalist@...
> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 1:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [tied] IRMIN
>
>
> > We're talking New Persian or Ossetic here, right? Thus, in those
>, *<alaman>*ya > *i is rather old, apparently older than lambdacism, and
>
> Ossetic can be regarded as Modern Alanic. The change of unstressed
>and
>
> > But still, isn't it an extraordinary coincidence? I see the Alans
> their Germanic-speaking allies sitting at the campfire around a bigBy the time they were finished with their quality time together after
> pot of cowboy coffee, singing:
> "
> You say ariman
> we say ariman
> and both words mean the same
> and yet they are not related
> "
> > (actually it sounds much better in the Alanian)
>
> You make them similar.
>Or to his spear?
> Did Geiseric owe his name to his geyseric temper?
>language. We only have the Latin form, hence the asterisk. *xarja-
>
> > And BTW: *hariman. Note the asterisk. Not attested.
>
> Don't blame me for the Langobards' illiteracy in their own
>Torsten
> Piotr