Re: [tied] OIT and Atlantis

I don't quite understand your surprise about a "foreign" group
wishing to discuss archaeology with Michael Cremo. I'm familiar
with "Forbidden Archaeology" and other than some VERY early claims
that humans existed in the Precambrian, I've found his reasoning
sound and his scholarship (although removed from the
mainstream) "spot on". But I do agree with you that the title says
it all: this is forbidden archaeology.

Gerry Reinhart-Waller

--- In cybalist@..., "Piotr Gasiorowski" <gpiotr@...> wrote:
> What I find particularly surprising is that any responsible
official should have wished to discuss these things with Michael
Cremo. Those on the list who know anything about palaeoanthropology
will probably have heard of "Forbidden Archaeology: The Hidden
History of the Human Race". The title says it all. The book is a
mixture of pseudoscientific sensationalism and demagoguery in equal
proportions, with a superficially scholarly façade to make it look
more respectable than the average anti-evolutionary trash. What next,
I wonder? Will von Däniken be invited to express his opinion as well?
>
> Piotr