>
> Not to dilute your point, but since it's been mentioned, didn't
> word final /s/ become voiceless [h] already in Proto-Indo-Iranian?
I should have written "... word final [s] become ..." since, of
course word final /s/ could also manifest as [z] and/or assimilate
the position of the initial of the next word.
David
Previous in thread: 13259 Next in thread: 13261 Previous message: 13259 Next message: 13261