From: mbikqyres
Message: 13017
Date: 2002-04-04
>of
> --- In cybalist@..., "Piotr Gasiorowski" <gpiotr@...> wrote:
> > <be> comes from *bHoidH-ah2, cognate to Lat. fi:dere (*bHeidH-),
> fide:s (*bHidH-) and to Germanic *bi:dan 'await' (*bHeidH-). It is
> unrelated to the *bHendH- 'bind' root, from which <besë> apparently
> derives (via *bHendH-s-ah2).
> >
> > Piotr
> >
> >
> Semantically, they're too close for comfort. What if the -n- was
> originally a present infix, then you'd have two roots *bHAdH- and
> *bHAidH-? Messy.
>
> BTW, to Alvin: If there is an old sea-related terminology among
> Albanian fishermen, considering the relevance of that to questions
> Albanian ethogenesis, shouldn't someone see to it that it isrecorded?
>Probably somebody has. At least I hope so.
> Torsten