From: george knysh
Message: 12936
Date: 2002-03-29
> It might be of your interest to know that*****GK: What are the origins of Harappan
> archaeological data showing
> the late survival of Harappan features, and absence
> of intrusive
> elements (beyond Baluchistan highlands and NWFP in
> Pakistan) have
> forced several Indologists to revise their theories.
> For instance,
> Michael Witzel earlier postulated around 1700
> BC-1500 BC as the date
> of arrival of Aryans into India but has now been
> pushing the dates
> closer to 1000 BC. In his latest publication (web
> article), he now
> even advocates that Dravidian speakers also entered
> India along with
> Aryans, and both displaced Austric speakers.
> sure***GK: Thank you for the reference. No DNA tests yet I
> > that it covers precisely this time frame?*****
> VA: The time frame is fixed by comparing the human
> remains from
> various archaeological levels genetically, from the
> phenotype
> perspective and then comparing them with present day
> resident
> populations of those areas. A good resource on this
> is
>
> God-apes and fossil men : paleoanthropology of South
> Asia / Kenneth
> A. R. Kennedy.
> Published Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press,
> c2000.
> Description xvii, 480 p. : ill., maps ; 26 cm.
>the Scythian
>
> >(earlier)=== *****GK: But there is the analogy of
> > Foundation Legend. Recorded by Herodotus in 450*****GK: See the beginning of Book IV basically. It'll
> BC, it
> > gives the impression that the Scythians were
> > autochtons. Yet their leading component, the
> Paralata
> > (Pararya-ta) had arrived scarcely two centuries
> > earlier.*****
> VA: I will read the 'Histories' to understand what
> you are saying.
> (Vishal)Herodotus cannot be trusted completely BTWfor many
> of his*****GK: Not this one, at least as a report of
> descriptions are fantastic.
> difference between a*****GK: I'm sure the Scythians would have considered
> random legend and a massive corpus of literature
> which is perhaps 6
> times the length of the Bible.