From: vkarloukovski
Message: 12758
Date: 2002-03-19
> --- In cybalist@..., "Piotr Gasiorowski" <gpiotr@...> wrote:...
>>can't see it in Dalmatian either, despite its genetic proximity tothere is an earlier, pre-XII c. evidence of postfixed articles
>>Romanian. The early Slavic languages of the Balkans don't show this
>>innovation; it appeared about the 12th century and took some time
>>to be fully implemented, as Bulgarian and Macedonian shifted
>>typologically from inflected to analytic. As there are examples of
>>postfixed articles in Russian dialects, it's possible that the
>>construction had existed in embryonic form already in Common
>>Slavic, but its use was very limited until contact with Balkan
>>Romance and/or early Albanian boosted its frequency.
> The point I was trying to make, some sentences back, is that such
> constructions may "hide" in the language. You ask native speakers
> of the language: ...
> Now to the application: Obviously the late appearance in the Balkan
> languages of suffixed articles can't be used as an argument that it
> wasn't used in the spoken language. Imagine the experiment that all
> we knew of 21st century Russian was a collection of various laws.
> Would we conclude from them that Russian had a suffixed article -
> ot, -ta, -to? Not very likely, I'd say.