> considerable contingent of former Roman provincials, more or less
> strongly Romanized Daco-Carpian groups, other Sarmatians, and
I have no clue where from could the author to take this construct "
romanised daco-carpian".
there were no romanised Daco-carpian. The carpians never seen
legionars feet if we do not consider the batles against the romans.
nor they ever been under romans rules. So how then "romanies
carpians"?????????????