Re: [tied] Re: Scythians, Zoroastrians, etc.

From: george knysh
Message: 12553
Date: 2002-02-28

--- Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@...> wrote:
> The name [ZALMOXIS]is Getic, in the first place, and
I don't
> think a careful distiction between Getic (Dacian)
> and Thracian is unnecessary pedantry.

*****GK: What is your view on the Costoboci? As Horia
Vlad pointed out a couple of days ago, the name
[COSTOBOCI]originally appears in a list of Don basin
Sarmatian tribes (PLINY, Nat.Hist.,VI,vii,19) Would a
plausible Iranic explanation be available? On the
other hand the group's 2nd c. AD royal family bears
Thracian (Getic?) names. Is a Thracian (
alternatively Getic) explanation also possible?
Perhaps the Iranic and Thracian/Getic would converge?
[I notice BTW that another Thracian word list has
ZAN-, ZENES for "clan, family" where you have tried
Iranic "ZANA" in the matter of the Alizones].===== A
correction as to the Costobocan context from Ammianus
Marcellinus: this is found not in Book XXXI (as per
Vlad) but in XXII,8,42.*****



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Greetings - Send FREE e-cards for every occasion!
http://greetings.yahoo.com