Re: [tied] Scythians, Zoroastrians, etc.

From: george knysh
Message: 12508
Date: 2002-02-26

--- Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@...> wrote:
> If you got "red" from searching the Cologne
> dictionary for "zona" (coming up with <zoNa> 'red'),
> forget it. The dictionary uses the Harvard-Kyoto
> spelling convention, whereby various ASCII
> characters are arbitrarily assigned to "exotic"
> letters to enable the exact transcription of
> Sanskrit in ASCII terms. <zoNa> stands for <s'on.a>,
> with a voiceless palatal initial, unlikely to be
> represented as Greek <z>.
>
> Piotr

*****GK: How would you expect this to appear in
Herodotus? Can you say that a rendition via a "z" is
impossible?*******
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: george knysh
> To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 1:24 AM
> Subject: Re: [tied] Scythians, Zoroastrians, etc.
>
>
>
> *****GK: It could also be "Ala-zona", meaning
> "excellent bay horse"(s). A good "Scythian"
> appellative (cf. also reconstructed "Tri-aspa";
> "Callipidae" (Her. Gk.); and "wild white horses"
> (Her.) The colour "red" indicative of
> south/southwest
> is also appropriate, as is the location on the
> "Hypanis" (a river with an Indian homonym). So
> Pontic
> Indic is possible. But "Thrakoid" can't be ruled out
> given the attested extant vocabulary parallels
> between
> Thracian and Indic (acc. to Duridanov's lexicon
> nearly
> 10%), and of course Iranic can't be ruled out
> either.******
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com