Re: [tied] *kuningaz (again)

From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
Message: 12201
Date: 2002-01-30

On Wed, 30 Jan 2002 22:35:45 +0100, "Piotr Gasiorowski"
<gpiotr@...> wrote:

>I may be wrong, but I have the creeping suspicion that the tentative idea of *-o blocking the palatalisation was inspired by the case of *igo 'yoke' (which, to my mind, only shows that the word was still *jUgo when the progressive palatalisation occurred).

The example given is <lIgota>.


=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...