Re: [tied] *kuningaz (again)

From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
Message: 12195
Date: 2002-01-30

On Wed, 30 Jan 2002 18:11:03 +0200, "Sergejus Tarasovas"
<S.Tarasovas@...> wrote:

>The third palatalization is the same change */k/>/c/([ts]), */g/>/dz/,
>*/x/>/s/ or /s^/ but _after_ */i/,*/I/,*/Ir/ or */e,/ if that */e,/ is
>from earlier *[in] or *[In]. It has sometimes succeded, sometimes
>failed, and there are no strict rules to predict that succes or failure.
>It's often stated, though, that it was blocked by a consonant or a
>middle or back vowel (first of all, */y/,*/U/,

Are you sure about /U/?


=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...