From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 11956
Date: 2001-12-31
> *li- in the lambdicising dialect in question. The underlying IE root is*leip- 'stick, adhere; fat' (as in Slavic *le^piti), with fairly general and varied semantics. Even Eng. life, live (< *li:b- < *leip-) are thought by many authors to belong here, via something like 'stick' > 'stay, remain' [Goth. bi-leiban, Germ. b-leiben] > 'live'. Somewhat paradoxically, Eng. leave is a family member as well, being derived from the causative *laibjan- < *loip-(e)je- 'cause to remain, leave behind'. I'm digressing, but my purpose is to show the possible extent of semantic drift for such a root.
----- Original Message -----From: george knyshSent: Saturday, December 29, 2001 3:57 AMSubject: [tied] SkolotaBTW as to Leipoxais. I would be pleasantly surprised if you found a way to link the chap to the "oldest brother" of later legends. But even if you can't find the evidence, two out of three is not bad at all. The
mythogenic continuity was certainly broken with the re-(?)establishment of the older brother's significance. So if "thunder, lightning, hammer etc." don't work for old Leipo- alternatives more in line with the specifics of the Scythian legend might. Something to do with agriculture, fields, earth, soil, in other words an "Aukhata" orientation (since Leipo- was their ancestor). Might one of the meanings of Sanskrit LIP- be at all relevant here?