From: Tore Gannholm
Message: 11808
Date: 2001-12-15
>Hi,
>On a google-search I came across this essay from Mads Peder Nordbo
>from the South Danish University, and I found it quite interesting.
>I have read Jörgen Chr. Bangs essays before, and it was nice to see
>that he has a co-worker.
>
>He is amog other things exploring further the connection betweeen the
>p-,b-, e-, m- and u-runes.
>There were also some new points about the origin of the p-rune.
>If I may summarize the theory I undrestood it as if there originally
>were only one sound( or the b- and p- sounds were too similar to have
>different runes). Then came a change in the language wich made the p-
>rune necessary.
>The rune was created on the b-rune, where the number of bi-staves
>were kept intact, but two of the staves which in the b-rune points
>inwards were in the p-rune made pointing outwards as a signification
>of the spiration.
>For some reason the rune carvers in scandinavia then switches back to
>write with only th b-rune (cf. the Vadstena bracteate). This Nordbo
>dates to ca 550.
>
><http://www.mpn3.dk/runer.PDF>http://www.mpn3.dk/runer.PDF
><http://www.mpn3.dk/>http://www.mpn3.dk/
>
>Nordbo himself doesn't hawe a theory why this happens, one *could*
>take it that it's because b and p again becomes less dissimilar,
>pehaps even the same.
>I have also noted that the p-rune is not *that* common in the Anglo-
>Saxon futhorc either, even though I'm unsure *how common.
>
>I think I've developed a hypothesis how this would fit with the p/f/b-
>part of Grimms and Verner's law's
>For simplicity I copied a presetation of Verner's law from a web page:
><http://www.cord.edu/faculty/sprunger/e315/grimm.htm>http://www.cord.edu/facult
>y/sprunger/e315/grimm.htm
>*****'
>Verner's Law
>Karl Verner, 1875
>Danish linguist wondered why not every I-E stop changed in the same
>way. His formulation established that Grimm's Law was consistent and
>could account for all known cognate evolution
>
>Intermediate step in Stage 1 shift:
>(1)All voiceless stops changed once:
>
>ph --> f
>
>th --> theta
>
>kh --> h
>
>sh --> s z
>
>
>
>(2)If the sound was in an initial position or immediately after a
>stressed verb, it changed no further.
>(3)Those in other positions changed to voiced spirants (b, d, g)
>*******
>So here it goes:
>I assume that the development of the changes comes from a people
>speaking a language without the p-sound-like e. g. hebrew or arabic-,
>learning words comming from a language with p-sound e. g. any IE-
>language. The result *could* be the changes (1) and (3) above i.e
>that the words are learned, but pronunced alternatively f and b
>depending on initial positions of not.
>Just as the scarcity of the p-rune suggests.
>
>Then I perhaps can make Tore happy.
>What if the total elimination of the p-rune from Vadstena and on is a
>result of another wave of immigrants with this hypothetical original
>language not understanding why there is a p-rune in the alphabet wich
>is (almost) never used? (long sentence).
>Perhaps they even before used the same alphabeth without the p-rune.
>
>If the dating of the Vadstena bracteate is correct at 550,could the
>suggest that the people arriving was the heruls, Tore?
>
>Note, this last part about the Heruls doesn't really belong to my
>theory.
>I'm still highly uncertain on the matter. One reason is ´the
>credability of Jordanes and Prokopius.
>
>Best wishes
>Anders
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT
><http://rd.yahoo.com/M=178320.1681224.3270152.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=1705739206:
>HM/A=879172/R=0/*http://www.fastweb.com/ib/yahoo-75f>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
><http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>Yahoo! Terms of Service.