From: tgpedersen@...
Message: 11304
Date: 2001-11-20
> --- In cybalist@..., "Alexander Stolbov" <astolbov@...> wrote:of
> > I don't think that the Kingdom of Vani could be a good candidate
> for Vanir.
> > The reasons why not are, IMHO:
> >
> > - Geography. The Vanaheim is situated on the Tanais banks (a
> neighbour
> > region of Asaheim), but not behind the Caucasus mountain far
> southward.
> >
> > - A town. The center of the Kingdom of Vani was the town of Vani
> but towns
> > of Vanir were never mentioned (in contrast with Asgaard) - only
> Vanaheim and
> > Vanaland.
> >
> > - Way of life. During the war "victory was changeable, and they
> ravaged the
> > lands of each other, and did great damage". If Aesir were semi-
> nomads, Vanir
> > had to be (semi)nomads too, otherwise the war would not have a
> character as
> > described and would not finished with mutual love. Actually one
> thepeople
> > tribes was incorporated in the structure of another one.
> >
> > If Aesir are not a fruit of imagination of ancient Scandinavians,
> but a real
> > tribe they must be Asses (= Yass = Yazig), a group of Alanian
> > (sometimes Asses were equated with Alans, sometimes werementioned
> side byplace,
> > side with them). Everything - name (letter by letter), time,
> many[snip]
> > details fit well.
> >
>
> >
> >
> > Alexander
> >
>
>port
> Which was a rather long way of saying that you can't conclude from
> the existence of the port of Vani that the Vani themselves were
> sedentary. They might well have been semi-nomadic, coming to the
> only for trade. One wouldn't conclude from the existence of FortI sat a my favorite café Sunday, which has a large map of Europe and
> Apache that the Apache were sedentary? And perhaps the "land of the
> Vani" was as elusive as the "land of the Apache"?
>