Re: [tied] Re: Swat River.

From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 11069
Date: 2001-11-06

This (stressed) *-tHa- recurs in Indo-Iranian ordinals, and is completely equivalent to PIE *-to- as regards its function. I doubt if the aspiration can be reconstructed beyond Proto-Indo-Iranian, but I have no ready answer to the question how it arose. *-t-h2-o- is possible but somewhat ad hoc. Aspirated *tH tends to replace inherited *t in several Indo-Iranian suffixes, e.g. helping to distinguish deverbal adjectives in *-ta- from similarly formed (and also suffix-stressed) nouns in *-tHa-: Skt. rik-ta- 'left', rik-tHa-m 'property left to inheritors'. The underlying morphophonological processes are not very clear (to me at any rate).
 
Piotr
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Sergejus Tarasovas
To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 10:18 PM
Subject: [tied] Re: Swat River.

Why does an aspirate -tH- appears in *pak-tHa-? Is that some specific development of PIE *-t- or a completely different formant (from *t-H- or so)?