Re: [tied] Interpreting some Scythian names

--- george knysh <gknysh@...> wrote:
So according to

> Dumezil the 3rd and 4th names /.../ can be well

explained by Avestan terms, but not

> the 1rst and 2nd ...*****

****GK: Sorry for the possible confusion. I switched
to another sequence here with these names. AUKHATA=
name n. 1 (from eldest brother);CATIARI, TRASPIES=
names n. 2 and 3 (from middle brother); and
PARAL(D)ATAE= name n. 4 (from youngest brother)******

>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
> http://personals.yahoo.com
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com