Re: Which Manansala? (was [tied] a(i)s-)

--- In cybalist@..., "Piotr Gasiorowski" <gpiotr@...> wrote:

> First, I deliberately imitated Manansala's sloppy practice and did
> not analyse my own "matches" etymologically. I wouldn't be that
> stupid when offering a serious etymological proposal. I could show
> you that, e.g. <gumi> and <dagana> are not related to each other or
> to *dHg^Hom- (it so happens that their origin is known quite well).
>

Yes, please.

> Piotr

Torsten