[tied] Re: Ca_i, tea

From: cas111jd@...
Message: 10144
Date: 2001-10-11

--- In cybalist@..., "Piotr Gasiorowski" <gpiotr@...> wrote:
> You mean "Austric", not "Austronesian". The Austric hypothesis
proposes that several language families of SE Asia are genetically
related. They include Austronesian, Tai-Kadai, Hmong-Mien, and
Austroasiatic (= Munda + Nicobarese + Mon-Khmer). The Mundas are not
Austronesians, though there may be a distant relationship between the
two families.
>
> Piotr
>
>
Actually, I already caught myself and changed my post from
Austronesian to Austroasiatic. As I understand it, Munda is (or was)
counted in the Austroasiatic family.

Now that I think about it a
little more, though, tea is normally grown on hillsides and uplands.
This may have been in Tai-Kadai regions. The Austroasiatics seem to
have been more lowland peoples, though there were apparently some Mon
states in northern Thailand before the Thais arrived.

cas