Re: [tied] IE numbers

From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
Message: 10091
Date: 2001-10-10

On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 01:23:10, "Glen Gordon" <glengordon01@...>
wrote:

>The view that *kWetwor- is a single atomic root, however, has
>the advantage of being connected externally to the Tyrrhenian
>numeral *xotta (Etr. huth, Gr. Ytte:nia=Tetrapolis) and further
>to Altaic "five" (OJapanese itu-) while avoiding typical ad-hoc
>dissection of a common IE root.

So what about *kwete-sor- (*kweto-sr-)?