Re: [tied] Mid IE Phonology

>Thanks, Glen! Very interesting. This looks much more like a real
>language than the traditional phonological reconstructions (eg,
>Beekes).

(I meant a/ë vs o/e, and t/t:/d vs t/d/dh etc.)

>Could you please provide some examples?

>I'm glad that *someone* appreciates my Mid IE madness ;) Examples?

...

Thanks again for the examples (very interesting - as always :-)). Sorry I
was vague. I was thinking of examples comparing the traditional
phonol.reconstructions (eg, p, t, k, kW) with yours (p, t, tW, k, kW). Are
there extant languages with a comparable phonology? Perhaps a stupid
question, but if there were forms like tW-/kW-, could there also have been
forms like ty-/ky-?

Marc