Re: Dravidian in Persia?

From: naga_ganesan@...
Message: 9743
Date: 2001-09-24

--- In cybalist@..., "S.Kalyanaraman" <kalyan97@...> wrote:

> As regards the 'dravidian-like grammatical structure' hypothesised
>by Parpola and Mahadevan, it looks totally UNSOUND to me.

This is not a surprise.

For years, Kalyanaraman is writing how the linguists have
wrongly formed a language family called Dravidian. In Indology list,
S. Kalyanaraman wrote in 1995:
"I think I have proved that Burrow and Emeneau's
work is an aberrant, erroneous construct of a artificial family; ..."

He has proceeded to key in the some available
dictionaries of Indian languages and this's what makes him
claim that Dravidan linguists' works and DED are
"aberrant, erroneous construct".

Well, linguists see thru' all these.

Regards,
N. Ganesan

Previous in thread: 9742
Next in thread: 9748
Previous message: 9742
Next message: 9744

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts