From: celteuskara@...
Message: 9046
Date: 2001-09-04
>Express yourself @ another.com http://another.com
>> >Apart from all this Aryan indigenism nonsense [!] I was intrigued
>to see Renfrew's name pop up here. I wonder could anyone tell me the
>nature of his mistaken assumptions? I'm an archaeologist y'see, and
>have often criticised Renfrew's Anatolian model, without being too
>aware of the precise details.
>> >
>> >Cheers!
>> >Beinn Mac an Gheairr
>
>If one is to accept that language families such as Indo-European
>exist, one has to accept the methodology used to prove such 'facts'.
>
>I am not competent to accurately outline the 'facts' of the PIE
>homeland, but they rest mainly on lexical items combined with
>archaeological data; the picture you get is not of settled
>agriculturalists pioneering the European Bronze Age, but of an
>eneolithic/chalcolithic folk who lived mainly by stockbreeding. There
>is a near-universal consensus among those who really understand the
>issues that an Anatolian homeland is *impossible*.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>Vae victis.