Re: [tied] Re: Ergative Stage of PIE

From: Patrick C. Ryan
Message: 8692
Date: 2001-08-23

Dear Mark and Cybalisters:

 

 

----- Original Message -----
From: markodegard@...
To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 6:28 PM
Subject: [tied] Re: Ergative Stage of PIE

--- In cybalist@......, rao.3@...... wrote:
> --- In cybalist@......, markodegard@...... wrote:
> > Ergativity makes my hair stand on end.
> > Man-abs kill = the man committed murder.
>
> Do you have a specific example of a language where it works like
> this? AFAIK, Man-abs kill would mean 'the man died'.

Maybe I got it wrong. The whole thing really does make my hair stand
on end.

Intransitive verb = agent in absolute case.
Transitive verb = agent in ergative, patient in absolute.

'Kill' can be trans and intrans.


[PCR]
You are making something relatively simple very complicated.
Semantically, 'kill' is a two-participant verb. To 'kill' without someone doing it, is impossible. And someone must 'kill' someone. This two-participant characteristic makes 'kill' transitive. No intransitive employment is possible since the definition of intransitive is a one-participant verb, like 'die'. One cannot 'die' someone; one can only 'die'.
 
In passives, 'kill' is still transitive. A passive was originally a transitive construction in which the agent was not known or wanted to be expressed. The phrases with 'by' originated as instrumentals: 'he was killed by hanging' or 'he was killed with a knife'.
 
 
 
Pat
 

PATRICK C. RYAN | PROTO-LANGUAGE@...
(501) 227-9947 * 9115 W. 34th St. Little Rock, AR 72204-4441 USA
WEBPAGES: PROTO-LANGUAGE: http://www.geocities.com/proto-language/
and PROTO-RELIGION:
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/2803/proto-religion/indexR.html

"Veit ec at ec hecc, vindgá meiði a netr allar nío,
geiri vndaþr . . . a þeim meiþi, er mangi veit,
hvers hann af rótom renn." (Hávamál 138)