Re: [tied] The centum-word.

----- Original Message -----

From: Piotr Gasiorowski

To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 12:06 PM

Subject: Re: [tied] The centum-word.

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Glen Gordon

To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 8:22 AM

Subject: [tied] The centum-word.

Glen:
>>> Thus, a singular stem *dek^m- versus a plural stem *k^ont-. I do not need to reconstruct **penkweH- because the length is caused by analogy with the lower decads.

Miguel:
>> Which got their length from...?

Glen:

> The dual.

 

This is questionable. First, "20" shows a formative pattern different from that of the higher decads, also in languages that display the "pre-k^ont-" lengthening very clearly (e.g. Greek (e)wí:-kosi/-kati vs. penté:-konta) -- so "20" doesn't appear to be a very good starting-point for a chain of analogic changes. Secondly, the length of the first *i: in *wi:k^nti: can hardly reflect a dual inflection. In composition, the uninflected form *wi- would have been used, and **(d)wih1- would be an unlikely dual anyway. If we get *wi:- rather than *wi- in most branches, this is most likely due to compensatory lengthening.

 

If you wanted to defend analogic length, the only viable initiator would be "30", where the conflation of the collective *tri-h2 {"ten"-COLLECTIVE} with the compound *tri-{"decad"} could result in something like *trih2-k^ont- > Greek triákonta. Notice that we _must_ posit *trih2- for Greek, since compensatory lengthening in *tridk^ont- would have yielded *tri:konta. I'm not taking sides here, just pointing out possible courses to follow. As for my personal opinion, I regard the compensatory lengthening solution in cases like *penkWe:k^ont- or *wi:k^nti: as elegant and plausible, but there are many branch-specific problems that this theory leaves unsolved.

Miguel:

>> *dwi- is a form found only in composition. The independent form *dwoh3 is a dual, not a plural.

Glen:

As for *dwi-, there is also *dwoiH1, already just mentioned. Secondly, *dwoH3 is usually written *dwo:u but, whatever.

 

To be precise, the free form is the thematic stem *dw-o- with the expected animate or inanimate dual endings (no matter how you write them) of thematic nominals.

 

Piotr

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.