From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 6540
Date: 2001-03-11
----- Original Message -----From: Miguel Carrasquer VidalSent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 2:35 PMSubject: Re: [tied] <pir>There are very few examples of Hittite non-neuter n-stems (Friedrich only gives MUNUS-za, MUNUS-nas "woman" and the handful of -as/-anas words like haras "eagle" [under "mixed n-/a-stems"]), so I don't have a good idea of how to interpret them. Van den Hout (U. of Amsterdam) doubts between Friedrich's explanation (suppletion between a-stem nom.sg. haras, and oblique n-stem haran-) and a phonetic explanation (nom.sg. haran-s > hara(:)s). He mentions an "a-stem" acc.pl. arkammus "tributes" (arkammas, arkammanas) for expected *arkammanus, and irregular nom.sg. ishiminas, acc.sg. ishimenan besides ishima:s, ishimanan "knot". The word memiya(n)- ~ memin- "word" is highly irregular, ocuurring both as neuter and as common gender noun (nom. INIM-as (memias), acc. INIM-an (memian), n. memian, obl. memiyan- ~ memin-).