From: tgpedersen@...
Message: 5922
Date: 2001-02-05
> Beautiful summary. Thanks a lot.[snip]
> A note regarding the rest of your discussion:Rhine
> In some instances, archeology & linguistics fall well together.
> Archeologically the beaker cultures spread west from Ukrain to the
> delta (Corded ware 3000-2800 BC), then north to Brittain & south tothe
> Rhone delta (Bell beakers 2800-2500 BC), Iberia & Italy. Now,Dutch "touw" &
> "tooi" have the same etymology, but a very different meaning:touw=cord,
> tooi=ornament, tooien=embellish, voltooien=finish, Gothictaujan=finish,
> runic "ek horna tawido" = "I decorated this horn" = Dutch "iktooide [deze]
> hoorn". Probably the verb was derived from the noun, to denote thewith a
> cording/decorating/finishing of the beakers, later the connection
> cord got lost (runic). IOW, the beaker cultures seem to have spokenIE
> languages: perhaps Balto-Slavic (Ukrain, N-Eur.plains?), Germanicthese, but
> (S-Scandinavia) & Italo-Celtic (mid+W-Europe+Italy)? (or some of
> including Germanic; the Balto-Slavic RUKI rule could perhaps beexplained by
> continuing contact with the homeland). IMO it's difficult to findbetter
> explanations for cord=decorate, and it confirms Gimbutas' ideas ofthe
> Ukrainian homeland ca.3000BC. Transitions of meanings like this(eg, Latin
> "domus" = English "timber" suggest houses were made of wood) couldbe
> important for reconstructing the PIE lifestyle.This is an old thread, but how come this wasn't mentioned:?
>
> Marc Verhaegen
> http://www.onelist.com/community/AAT
> http://allserv.rug.ac.be/~mvaneech/Verhaegen.html