Re: IS's "regular roots"

--- In cybalist@..., Miguel Carrasquer Vidal <mcv@...> wrote:

> On Sat, 27 Jan 2001 10:17:03 CET, "Piotr Gasiorowski"
> <gpiotr@...> wrote:
>
> >But CVC is by no means the only (or even the clearly predominant)
> >phonotactic pattern in I-S/Dolgopolsky's Nostratic.
>
> Indeed not. It is of Bomhard's Nostratic. And his reconstructions
> contain more than enough homophones as it is, using 40 consonants or
> so.
>
> =======================
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> mcv@...

One solution to this reconstructed might of course be that some of
the roots were loaned...?

Torsten