From: Max Dashu
Message: 5532
Date: 2001-01-15
>But "lord of hosts" looks much more probable.
>> Not if you're familiar with any of the Indic languages. Besides "lord of
>>hosts" is not quite logical in any culture. Also, in the subcontinent, as
>>elsewhere, entertainment of guests was a very serious and humble duty.
>>The guest is the "lord". Darwin >>