Re: [tied] *laipu/*laipi/*lappi/*loopy/*loony...

On Tue, 14 Nov 2000 08:20:09 GMT, "Glen Gordon"
<glengordon01@...> wrote:

>I can only wonder how you explain IE *swe which ALREADY HAS the *sw- sound
>that is supposed to have disappeared in *(y)us- as you say. I can't imagine
>why this doesn't strike you as paradoxical or why you can't empathize with
>me that it understandably would sound absurd to anyone.

Think. How do you explain *ek^wos or *kwapnos [w not superscript],
with *k(^) + *w, as opposed to *kw [w superscript]?


=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...