Re: [tied] Catching up again...

From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
Message: 4662
Date: 2000-11-12

On Sun, 12 Nov 2000 11:17:46 -0200, João Simões Lopes Filho
<jodan99@...> wrote:

>Thanks. I thought Etruscan cezph was pronnounce like Latin ce- ci-, as /s/
>or /ts/.

Classical Latin also had /ke/, /ki/. Etruscan cezp was pronounced
/ketsp/, with /k-/ as in Etr. <ci> "three".

>Is Basque Z pronnounced as /s/ ? Was not /th/ ?

<z> is a laminal alveolar sibilant (like N. French or S. Spanish /s/),
<s> is an apical alveolar sibilant (like S. french or N. Spanish /s/).

Latin /s/ was borrowed into Basque as <z>, Spanish and Gascon /s/ is
borrowed as Basque <s>.

I would transcribe /s/ and /s'/, although it's possible that
ultimately (in (Pre-)Pre-Basque) this derives from *s vs. *s^ ("sh")
[cf. my suggestion wanas^ -> *banas' > mahats].


=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...