Re: [tied] Re: Constructed or natural?

From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 4107
Date: 2000-10-02

Thanks, Håkan, but it's only my professional hopelessness. They pay me for it ;)
 
Piotr
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Håkan Lindgren
To: Cybalist
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 11:06 PM
Subject: [tied] Re: Constructed or natural?

Piotr, you are hopeless! :o)
 
Not only did you identify the false language (it's not a real conlang, it's just some phrases I made up last night) you also identified Malagasy and Madurese, which aren't languages one meets every day.
 
If linguistics were part of the Olympic games...
 
Hakan
 
 
(Damn, I should have tried something that didn't look "vaguely IE", like this -
aruntiran'oa tonutiranguan susuriaanaq turingianaat o kimigdiranguan eqarnierrepuk inasserierrerta. tori o tilanguvak. arunarmasserka torioranneq ungnerga tonutiranatsek ugingmiut silutarparrepuk tormiotargessaq
tilangerka. omerpoq nilutangnerga agomarirteq tonutissak ugingmiara tonutirangiassek uviartarpa kimigdirangiap
upirtarpaq pangnersuk turingiantussek.)