From: John Croft
Message: 2125
Date: 2000-04-14
> The similarities are so striking thatYes, I see a Proto-Indo-Iranian taking off from the Volga mouth of
> neither branch could have had time to
> change very much, which should put the
> earliest Vedic stratum well back in
> the second millenium BC.
> --end quote--
>
> This reflects what I've gotten from my reading.
>
> I do admit my comment about the proto-Indics
> being north of Afganistan at the back end of
> China was wrong; I know better, and knew better
> then, but was not thinking. The 'Aryans' entered
> India up the Oxus (I guess that's the name, the
> river flowing into the Aral from the southeast)
> and then over the mountains into the Indus
> catchment.
>
> There is also the reality that proto-Indic seems
> to be attested in Iran and the southern Caucusus
> before proto-Iranian is attested. It's as if the
> Indics were a first wave, with the Iranians as a
> second wave that never made it to India, but
> replaced Indic in Iran and thereabouts.
>
> Am I correct? Balto-Slavic (and Uralic) got its
> loans from Iranian, and NOT Indic.
>
> Chariots. The Indics had them first, then the
> Iranians (who seem to have been to the north and
> west of the Indics) and finally everyone else
> (and in probably a remarkably short period of time).